首页> 外文OA文献 >Two decades of qualitative research in psychology, industrial and organisational psychology and human resource management within South Africa : a critical review
【2h】

Two decades of qualitative research in psychology, industrial and organisational psychology and human resource management within South Africa : a critical review

机译:二十年来在南非的心理学,工业和组织心理学以及人力资源管理方面的定性研究:一项批判性评论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ORIENTATION : Qualitative research is marked by phenomenal growth and development overthe years.RESEARCH PURPOSE : This article aims to offer insight into the emerging qualitative methodologiesused in the fields of Psychology, Industrial and Organisational Psychology and HumanResource Management.MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY : The value of qualitative organisational research has been recognisedsince the 1970s. Regardless of its perceived value, national and international trends show agreater tendency for quantitative research.RESEARCH DESIGN, APPROACH AND METHOD : This article investigates qualitative articles (n = 242)published over two decades in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology (SAJIP),South African Journal of Psychology (SAJP), and the South African Journal of Human ResourceManagement (SAJHRM). More specifically, a content analysis was conducted to highlight thetrends of paradigms, designs and analysis methods employed in the studies.MAIN FINDINGS : Although there seems to be a slight increase in qualitative publications overthe years, qualitative studies show a lower volume than its counterparts. The SAJIP publishedthe least qualitative articles when compared to the SAJP and SAJHRM. There is a pattern ofpreference for specific paradigms and methods in all the journals. Overall, all the journals carry a large number of articles that do not specifically state their paradigmatic alignment orthe designs they used, while some articles omits the methodology used in the studies altogether.PRACTICAL/MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS : The results indicate a clear need for increased exposure toqualitative methodology, both by publishing more qualitative studies in local journals and byproviding formal training opportunities. A publication does not solely rely on authorship, butalso on a review process. Therefore certain adjustments in this process may lead to more andbetter qualitative publications in future.CONTRIBUTIO/VALUE-ADD : This article provides a critical analysis of the current trends anddevelopments in qualitative research conducted in Industrial and Organisational Psychology(IOP) research in South Africa. The study identifies dominant methodologies in use, andthereby identifies possible opportunities to expand the ‘methodological menu’ of IOP research.
机译:研究方向:本文旨在提供对心理学,工业和组织心理学以及人力资源管理领域使用的新兴定性方法学的见解。定性组织研究自1970年代以来就被认可。无论其感知价值如何​​,国家和国际趋势都显示出更大的量化研究趋势。研究设计,方法和方法:本文研究了《南非工业心理学杂志》(SAJIP)发表了二十多年的定性文章(n = 242),南非心理学杂志(SAJP)和南非人力资源管理杂志(SAJHRM)。更具体地说,进行了内容分析,以突出研究中使用的范式,设计和分析方法的趋势。主要发现:尽管多年来定性出版物的数量似乎有所增加,但定性研究的数量却比同类出版物低。与SAJP和SAJHRM相比,SAJIP发表的文章质量最低。在所有期刊中都有对特定范式和方法的偏好模式。总体而言,所有期刊均载有大量文章,但并未具体说明其范式一致性或所使用的设计,而某些文章则完全省略了研究中使用的方法。实践/管理意义:结果表明显然需要增加暴露量定性方法论,既可以在当地期刊上发表更多定性研究,也可以提供正式的培训机会。出版物不仅仅依赖于作者身份,还依赖于评审过程。因此,在此过程中的某些调整可能会导致将来出现更多更好的定性出版物。CONTRIBUTIO / VALUE-ADD:本文对南非工业和组织心理学(IOP)研究中定性研究的当前趋势和发展进行了批判性分析。该研究确定了正在使用的主要方法,从而确定了扩大IOP研究的“方法菜单”的可能机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号